🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “total contradiction” for opposing tobacco control measures in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

A letter obtained by media dispatched by the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the African officials asks for plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be scrapped or postponed.

The company is attempting amendments to a proposed legislation that include reductions in the suggested dimensions of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavoured tobacco products, and diminished punishments for any firms breaking the new laws.

Activist commentary

“If I was a politician, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” said the health advocate.

Thousands of residents a year pass away from smoking-associated diseases, according to global health agency statistics.

Chimbala said the letter was known to have been circulated to several government departments and was in circulating through community advocacy networks.

Global industry interference concerns

It comes amid broader worries about business sector influence with medical guidelines. Recently, WHO officials sounded an alarm that the smoking product companies was increasing attempts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“There is proof of industry lobbying everywhere. Tobacco company fingerprints are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN summit conference,” stated the tobacco industry watchdog.

Possible outcomes

“Should anti-smoking legislation isn’t passed because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in lives of people who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The tobacco control bill going through Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and mandating that visual health alerts cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Via documentation, the corporation proposes this be decreased to 30% or 50% “following international suggested parameters”, deferred for no less than 12 months after the law is enacted.

Global health authorities actually suggests a caution must occupy at least 50% of the front of a pack “and aim to cover as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings are required to occupy nearly two-thirds of a packet’s front and back.

Flavor restrictions debate

BAT asks for the removal of broad restrictions on flavored cigarette varieties, arguing that it would lead smokers to “illicitly sold” products. It suggests prohibiting a smaller list of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The proposed legislation proposes sanctions for multiple violations “varying from a portion of yearly revenue to ten-year jail sentences”.

Company justification

Through correspondence, the company executive of the African subsidiary claims the company is dedicated to responsible corporate conduct” and “supports the objectives of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the connected wellbeing effects” but claims that “specific rules can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Critic response

The advocate stated the corporation's recommended amendments would “dilute these regulations so much that the impact needed for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that many such provisions were present in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “complete contradiction”, he commented.

“We reside in a connected world. When I cultivate smoking products in my property and collect the yield and distribute the goods – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to profit individually and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbour’s children are succumbing … is in itself total emotional collapse.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the United Kingdom or other countries had not resulted in corporate closures, Chimbala said. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Formal company response

The company representative said: “The company operates its activities following with current country statutes. Further, the company participates in the state's regulatory development in line with the appropriate structures which provide for interested party involvement in regulation development.”

The firm positioned itself as “not resisting legislation”, they said, noting that young individuals should be safeguarded against acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We advocate for progressive regulation to accomplish desired population health targets, while acknowledging the spectrum of rights and obligations on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the spokesperson stated, adding that the company's suggestions “mirror the circumstances of the Zambian market and cigarette sector, which encompasses growing volumes of black market activity”.

The nation's ministry of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was contacted for response.